Agenda and minutes

RESOLVED:

That the minutes of the meeting held on 16 July 2018 be approved as a correct record.

The Chair announced that, as set out in the update sheet,  agenda item 8, “HPK/2017/0692 Land off Simmondley Lane, Simmondley, Glossop, Derbyshire” had been withdrawn to enable the applicant to undertake a speed survey.

RESOLVED:

That the update sheet be noted.

RESOLVED:

That the report be noted.

Erection of 3 dwellings and works to the existing access and car parking

Applicant:        Inglebrook Inns & Taverns

The Committee had undertaken a site visit on 16 July 2018.

The Committee were addressed by Imran Kassim in objection to the application and Euan Connolly (agent).

RESOLVED:

That consideration of the application be deferred to enable further work to be undertaken around the projected impact on parking for the public house and off-street parking in the vicinity.

Proposed change of use from residential (C3) and office (B1) to mixed use development consisting of C3 residential and D1 Therapy Centre, with minor alterations to layout of rooms.

Applicant:        Mrs B Graham & Mrs A Hewitt

The Committee had undertaken a site visit.

The Committee were addressed by Martin Spencer in objection to the application and Amanda Hewitt and Bel Graham (applicants).

The Planning Officer reported on a late representation received objecting to the application in terms of parking in the area, hours of business, that the application seems to be retrospective and querying the type of therapy intended.

RESOLVED:

1.    That the application be approved as set out in the report, subject to the wording of condition 5 being amended to refer to ‘counselling services’

2.    That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Operations Manager – Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Development Control Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the committee’s decision.

The Chair announced that this item had been withdrawn to enable the applicant to undertake a traffic survey.

Erection of 2 storey extension to offices and main workshop

Applicant:        Mr Simon Wright

The Committee had undertaken a site visit.

The Committee were addressed by Simon Wright (applicant).

The Operations Manager – Development Services reported a late representation objecting to the application in terms of vehicle access, parking, increased traffic and over-development of the site.

RESOLVED:

1.    That planning permission be approved as set out in the report;

2.    That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Operations Manager – Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the committee’s decision.

Proposed conversion of former White Lion Public House (now known as the Artisan Quarter) and associated outbuildings to form 13 apartments.

Listed building consent for proposed conversion of former White Lion Public House (now known as the Artisan Quarter) and associated outbuildings to form 13 apartments

Applicant:        Mr John Baigent, The Artisan Quarter

The Committee had undertaken a site visit.

The Planning Officer reported a late representation in objection to the application from a local business raising concerns regarding parking to the rear of the building.

RESOLVED:

1.    That the applications be approved as set out in the report;

2.    That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Operations Manager – Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the committee’s decision.

Extension for DDA alterations to dwelling

Applicant:        Peter Chadwick, High Peak Borough Council

The Committee were addressed by Laura Lovatt (agent).

RESOLVED:

1.    That the application be approved as set out in the report;

2.    That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives  planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Operations Manager – Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the committee’s decision.

HPK/2016/0271 – variation of condition 32 to amend the approved plans approved under HPK.2013/0483

HPK/2016/0682 – erection of one dwelling

Applicant:        Treville Propeties Ltd.

The Committee had undertaken a site visit.

The Planning Officer reported on a late representation received from a local resident withdrawing their earlier objections on the grounds that the houses constructed so far appear to be well built and attractive.

The Committee were addressed by Pam Cohen in objection to the application and Ben Pyecroft (agent).

RESOLVED:

1.    Approved, subject to the completion of a Deed of Variation to the Section 106 agreement under HPK/2013/0483 to reference the new consent, HPK/2016/0271 and HPK/2016/0682 and subject to:

a.    The conditions as set out in the report

b.    The deletion of recommendation B in the report

2.    That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Operations Manager – Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Development Control Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the committee’s decision.

The Committee considered a proposed section 106 deed of variation in relation to outline planning permission ref: HPK/2016/0064 to omit the secured affordable housing provision equating to two onsite ‘rented’ units in lieu of a financial contribution of £78,400 towards offsite affordable housing provision and £8,000 towards tree planting.

During the ensuing debate, members queried whether the proposed contribution of £78,400 would be sufficient to provide the off site affordable housing provision, and requested a current market assessment of Hadfield be undertaken along with further information on the financial appraisal.

RESOLVED:

That consideration of the deed of variation be deferred, pending a current market assessment of the Hadfield area and further information on the submitted financial appraisal, to help establish whether the proposed financial contribution would be sufficient to provide the off site affordable housing provision.

Variation of condition 2 (revised access arrangements) on planning permission HPK/2015/0329

Applicant:        Mr A Harrison

RESOLVED:

1.    That the variation of condition application be approved, subject to the satisfactory completion of a deed of variation to the exiting section 106 agreement, and subject to the amended wording for condition 2 and all conditions attached to planning permission HPK/2015/0329 as set out in the report;

2.    That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives  planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Operations Manager – Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the committee’s decision.

RESOLVED:

That the report be noted.