Agenda and minutes

1.    Disclosable Pecuniary Interests

2.    Other Interests

Councillor Lomax declared an ‘other’ interest in agenda item 9, “DET/2022/0003 Valley Farm, Whitehough Head Lane, Chinley” (reason: applicant is a fellow councillor) and withdrew from the meeting during the consideration and voting thereon

RESOLVED:

That the minutes of the meeting held on 14 February be approved as a correct record.

RESOLVED:

That the report be noted.

RESOLVED:

That the report be noted.

Planning permission for the construction of a replacement spillway and associated dam infrastructure, replacement sailing club facilities including new access, replacement play equipment and park landscaping

Applicant:        Nick Wild, Canal and River Trust

The Committee had undertaken a site visit.

The Committee were addressed by Anna Cox and Richard Aldred in objection to the application and Richard Newton (applicant).

RESOLVED:

1.     That authority be delegated to the Head of Development Services, in consultation with  the Chair, to approve the application subject to:

a.     Updated comments from the LLFA in light of the amendments to the scheme and the Flood Risk Assessment addendum;

b.     The conditions as set out in the report; and

c.     The amended conditions as set out in the update sheet;

2.     That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.

The Chair advised that this application had been withdrawn by the applicant.

Lower ground floor attached garage to be formed partially through excavation.  Single storey side extension linking to two storey rear extension.  Inglenook single storey extension to kitchen.  Alterations to existing porch.

Applicant:        Mr Craig Jackson

The Committee viewed plans and photographs of the site.

The Committee were addressed by Richard Tamplin (also on behalf of Lesley Griffiths) in objection to the application and Craig Jackson (applicant).

RESOLVED:

1.     That the application be refused as set out in the report;

2.     That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.

General Purpose Agricultural Building

Applicant:        Mr Frank Longden

The Committee viewed plans and photographs of the site.

RESOLVED:

1.     That the details as submitted with the application be approved;

2.     That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.