Agenda and minutes

1.    Disclosable Pecuniary Interests

2.    Other Interests

Councillors Barrow and Todd declared an ‘other’ interest in agenda item 6, “HPK/2021/0645 & HPK/2021/0646 Market Hall, Market Place, Glossop” (reason: HPBC Executive Councillors) and withdrew from the meeting during the consideration and voting on the application

Councillor Barrow declared an ‘other’ interest in agenda item 8, “HPK/2022/0124 28 Park Road, Buxton” (reason: in the same political party as one of the objectors)

Councillor Oakley declared an ‘other’ interest in agenda item 8, “HPK/2022/0124 28 Park Road, Buxton” (reason: know Councillor Hall who has objected)

Councillor Todd declared an ‘other’ interest in agenda item 8, “HPK/2022/0124 28 Park Road, Buxton” (reason: Buxton Labour Councillor) and withdrew from the meeting during the consideration and voting on the application

Councillor Barrow declared an ‘other’ interest in agenda item 11, “HPK/2022/0065 – 2 Hawthorn Bank, Hadfield, Glossop” (reason: I know the applicant’s mother as a Councillor and Executive Member.  I do not know the applicant)

Councillor R McKeown declared an ‘other’ interest in agenda item 11, “HPK/2022/0065 – 2 Hawthorn Bank, Hadfield, Glossop” (reason: I know the applicant) and vacated the chair in favour of the vice-chair and withdrew from the meeting for the consideration and voting on the application

Councillor Todd declared an ‘other’ interest in agenda item 11, “HPK/2022/0065 – 2 Hawthorn Bank, Hadfield, Glossop” (reason: Co-member of the Executive and friend of Councillor Sloman.  Acquaintance of the applicant, Rachel Sloman) and withdrew from the meeting during the consideration and voting on the application

RESOLVED:

That the minutes of the meeting held on 9 May 2022 be approved as a correct record.

RESOLVED:

That the update sheet be noted.

RESOLVED:

That the report be noted.

Refurbishment and alteration of the market hall - installation of new mezzanine, stairwells and installation of retail units at ground and mezzanine floor level.  Alteration and replacement of windows and external doors and new access ramps and steps to West facing elevation. Installation of external mechanical plant area to East facing side of building and new louvered screen and gates.  Alteration of ground floor toilet areas. General refurbishment of the arcade area and existing ground floor and refurbishment and restoration of the first floor town hall. Replacement of the platform lift currently located in the stairwell.

Applicant:        High Peak Borough Council

The Committee had undertaken a site visit.

RESOLVED:

1.      That planning permission and listed building consent be approved as set out in the report;

2.      That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.

Proposed garage and underground storage/utility space, rear patio

Applicant:        Mr Craig Jackson

The Committee were addressed by Mr S Tamplin (also on behalf of Lesley Griffiths) in objection to the application.

The Committee viewed plans and photographs of the site.

RESOLVED:

1.      That the application be approved as set out in the report;

2.      That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.

Change of use from House of Multiple Occupation (HMO) to Holiday Lets

Applicant:        Mr Matthew Rushton

The Committee were addressed by Dr R Hall in objection to the application and Mr M Rushton (applicant).

The Committee viewed plans and photographs of the site.

RESOLVED:

1.      That the application be approved as set out in the report;

2.      That in the event of any changes being needed to the working of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informative/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.

Proposed detached garage building with habitable accommodation at first floor

Applicant:        Mr G Lester

The Committee viewed plans and photographs of the site.

RESOLVED:

1.      That the application be approved as set out in the report;

2.      That in the event of any changes being needed to the working of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informative/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.

Retrospective application for Full Planning and Listed Building Consent for rooflights

Applicant:        Mr Nigel Webb

The Committee were addressed by Mark Strawbridge (agent)

The Committee viewed plans and photographs of the site.

RESOLVED:

1.      That planning permission and listed building consent be refused as set out in the report;

2.      That in the event of any changes being needed to the working of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informative/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.

Single storey rear extension and two storey front extension

Applicant:        Rachel Sloman

The Committee viewed plans and photographs of the site.

RESOLVED:

1.      That planning permission be refused as set out in the report;

2.      That in the event of any changes being needed to the working of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informative/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.